On December 2, I wrote the following regarding obsessed bigot Don Douglas:
"On a side note, Don Douglas continues his strange obsession with me, while inserting himself somehow into this story, and as always, gets thing very much wrong:
That said, as a follow up from this afternoon, I'm reiterating my call for Larisa Alexandrovna -- who has smeared me personally as racist -- to issue an apology and retraction for her Bill Sparkman race-baiting. Ms. Alexandrovna's racist allegations against conservatives seek to delegitimized partisanship and shut down debate -- these smears are all the leftists have left, so don't expect much from these people, so intent to gain political capital from the cult of victimology.
Wonderful job there Sherlock. Douglas seems to have noticed (because he visits my blog often) that I had not apologized for my Bachmann/Census/Sparkman discussions. He even reiterated his call that I do so and on the same day too (apparently visiting my blog more than once a day).
Yet he seems to either have entirely missed or purposefully omitted something rather obvious. I had not blogged anything for over a week about any topic at all. I was entirely MIA, to the point where people were emailing me and calling me to see if I was alright.
I suppose Douglas also did not notice that I had not been on Twitter (since he follows me) for about a week either. So why make it seem as though I simply refused to apologize when the reality is that I was entirely MIA, in bed, and flaring badly?
Douglas owes me an apology for his false conclusions. I don't expect one or even need one. But if we are keeping score, then he up to bat in the apology sphere."
I concluded my entry with this:
"Shall we wager on how quickly Don will pen a shiny new blog entry entirely devoted to me? I give him 48 hours. Thoughts?"
I gave him 48 hours, so I lose the bet, because today (a week later) Don delivers his latest:
I attack Barack Obama all the time, but his race is never an issue for me. I deeply appreciate the historic signifcance of Obama's election. I don't like him because he's a radical socialist with a subterranean totalitarian agenda. But to blog that, to call out Obama for the ideological and moral disaster he is for this country gets me branded a racist. And again, that's because the nihilist crazies on the fever-swamp left have got nothing better to do that hang around all day waiting for an off-color political remark, and then, BAM, they've got their prey in the victimology crosshairs.
The link goes to my blog. Now, let's all recall that I have repeatedly suggested that you read Don's blog for yourselves and see what conclusions you draw. Don't take my word that he is a bigot. Read him in his own words. Astonishingly, Don is now playing the victim card (victimology? m'kay) by claiming he has been "branded" a racist. Yes, branded by me with my big ass branding iron.
The man, in response, "branded" me with his "terrorist" branding iron.
(more after the fold)
But I really have to ask why he continues inserting me into his postings over and over, even when there is no relevancy, relationship to anything I have said or written, and even after he has repeatedly distorted my words and been called out on it? If you notice, his post is in defense of another Conservative blogger, one I don't really know. I don't think I have ever written about the "Other McCain" and if I have, perhaps only in passing a long time ago. So why does Don feel the need to insert me into this post? Oh, because he himself is a "victim" of the "victimology crosshairs."
Don then signals his complete decent into madness:
Charles Johnson, Larisa Alexdrovna, the Media Matters cabal, Firedoglake. Hey, if you're looking for some race-shakedown industry allies, you know where to go. Meanwhile, all of this bulls*** has to STOP.
I confess to be at a loss here. Which bullshit has to stop? The bullshit that all Muslims are terrorists? The bullshit that killing off Muslims is a good thing? The bullshit of the birther CT? The bullshit of the Obama=socialism agenda CT (while pretending the Bush years did not happen)? The bullshit that Obama has a "subterranean totalitarian agenda" (while pretending the Bush years did not happen)? The bullshit that all liberals are commies and/or terrorists? I could go on, obviously, but you get the idea.
Like all bullies, Don can dish it out, but cannot take it. He claims that any criticism of his bigotry is just trying to catch him - the "prey" - in the "victimology crosshairs." He is always the victim, but no one else has the right to feel victimized. Nice double - standard there, no?
All of that aside, did anyone bet (while I was gone and back into bed with my bad kidney) that Don would find a way to insert me into his lunacy 7 days after my post? If so, come on down, you are the winner of something or other (I still have to figure out what).
The betting is reset now. Let us wager how long after this - my post - Douglas writes about me again.
(Mr. Holsinger, I trust that I can expect a proper branding iron graphic from you shortly?)
